the following argument If Abraham doesn't buy groceries , he will order take-out for dinner. Abraham bought groceries. Therefore, Abraham will not order take-out. Which statement is its conclusion? Abraham didn't buy groceries If Abraham doesn't buy groceries, he will order take-out. Abraham bought groceries Abraham will not order take-out Abraham will order take-out Which statements are its premises? Select all that apply. Abraham didn't buy groceries If Abraham doesn't buy groceries, he will order take-out. Abraham bought groceries Abraham will not order take-out Abraham will order take-out How will we symbolize the premises and-conclusion using the simple statements: p - Abraham buys groceries q - Abraham orders take-out Premise 1: Select an answer 0 Premise 2: ? 0 Conclusion: ? B

To analyze the argument, let's break it down:**Conclusion:**The conclusion of the argument is "Abraham will not order take-out."**Premises:**1. "If Abraham doesn't buy groceries, he will order take-out for dinner."2. "Abraham bought groceries."Now, let's symbolize the premises and conclusion using the simple statements:- : Abraham buys groceries- : Abraham orders take-out**Symbolization:**- **Premise 1:** "If Abraham doesn't buy groceries, he will order take-out." This can be symbolized as: - **Premise 2:** "Abraham bought groceries." This can be symbolized as: - **Conclusion:** "Abraham will not order take-out." This can be symbolized as: So, the symbolic representation of the argument is:- Premise 1: - Premise 2: - Conclusion: