In this case, the court held that a valid claim was made by an individual who was denied a two week supply of transitional medication upon his release from prison, and stated the state must provide an outgoing prisoner who is receiving medication with a supply sufficient to ensure that he has that medication available during the period of time reasonably necessary to permit him to consult a doctor and obtain a new supply. A Durham v. U.S. (1954) B U.S. v. Hinckley (1981) C Estellev. Gamble (1976) D Dusky v. U.S. (1960) E Wakefield v. Thompson (1999)

Question

In this case, the court held that a valid claim was made by an individual who was denied a two week supply of transitional medication upon his release from prison, and stated the state must provide an outgoing prisoner who is receiving medication with a supply sufficient to ensure that he has that medication available during the period of time reasonably necessary to permit him to consult a doctor and obtain a new supply. A Durham v. U.S. (1954) B U.S. v. Hinckley (1981) C Estellev. Gamble (1976) D Dusky v. U.S. (1960) E Wakefield v. Thompson (1999)

Answer 1

The case you are referring to is E. Wakefield v. Thompson (1999). In this case, the court held that the state must provide an outgoing prisoner who is receiving medication with a supply sufficient to ensure that he has that medication available during the period of time reasonably necessary to permit him to consult a doctor and obtain a new supply.

Soru

Çözüm

Cevap