Text 1 Question ID 03080769 10: 03050769 Philosopher GE Moorel most influential work entails the concept of common sense. He asserts that there are certain that all people including philoophers know instinctively to be true, whether or not they profess otherwise among them that they have bodies or that they exist in a world with other objects that have three dimensions. Moore's careful work on common sense may seem obvious but was in fact proundbreaking a I works skepticism is a philosophical stance supposing that we cannot be sure of the existence of anything our can minds. During a lecture, G.E. Moore once offered a proof refuting this stance by holding out his hands and saying. There is one hand and here is another."Many philosopheres reflectively reject this proof (Annalisa Coliva called obviously annoying failure") but have found it a challenge to articulate exactly why the prooffaits. Based on the texts, how would the author of Text 1 most likely respond to proponents of the philosophical stance outlined in Text 2? By agreeing with those proponents that Moore's treatment of positions that contradict his own is fundamentally A. unserious By suggesting thatan instinctive distaste for Moore's position is preventing external work skeptics from constructing B. a sufficiently rigorous refusation of Moove By arguing that if it is valu to assert that some facts are true based on instinct it is also volid to assert that some C. proofs are inacksquate based on instinet By pointing out that Moore would assert that external world skepticism is at odtis with other beliefs those proponents D. must unaroidably hold

Question

Text 1 Question ID 03080769 10: 03050769 Philosopher GE Moorel most influential work entails the concept of common sense. He asserts that there are certain that all people including philoophers know instinctively to be true, whether or not they profess otherwise among them that they have bodies or that they exist in a world with other objects that have three dimensions. Moore's careful work on common sense may seem obvious but was in fact proundbreaking a I works skepticism is a philosophical stance supposing that we cannot be sure of the existence of anything our can minds. During a lecture, G.E. Moore once offered a proof refuting this stance by holding out his hands and saying. There is one hand and here is another."Many philosopheres reflectively reject this proof (Annalisa Coliva called obviously annoying failure") but have found it a challenge to articulate exactly why the prooffaits. Based on the texts, how would the author of Text 1 most likely respond to proponents of the philosophical stance outlined in Text 2? By agreeing with those proponents that Moore's treatment of positions that contradict his own is fundamentally A. unserious By suggesting thatan instinctive distaste for Moore's position is preventing external work skeptics from constructing B. a sufficiently rigorous refusation of Moove By arguing that if it is valu to assert that some facts are true based on instinct it is also volid to assert that some C. proofs are inacksquate based on instinet By pointing out that Moore would assert that external world skepticism is at odtis with other beliefs those proponents D. must unaroidably hold

Answer 1

## Step 1The problem involves understanding the philosophical stance of G.E. Moore, particularly his concept of common sense. According to Moore, there are certain basic truths that everyone, including philosophers, instinctively knows to be true, regardless of whether they openly acknowledge them. These truths include the existence of one's body and the existence of a three-dimensional world.## Step 2The problem also introduces the concept of skepticism, which is a philosophical stance that questions the certainty of anything. This is in direct opposition to Moore's concept of common sense.## Step 3The problem asks us to infer how the author of Text 1 would respond to proponents of the philosophical stance outlined in Text 2. The author of Text 1 would likely argue that Moore's concept of common sense is fundamentally incompatible with the stance of skepticism.## Step 4Looking at the options, option D seems to align with the author's likely response. It suggests that Moore would argue that skepticism is incompatible with other beliefs that people hold, which is consistent with his concept of common sense.

Soru

Çözüm

Cevap

Daha Fazla