Consider the following argument. If Keegan doesn't buy groceries, he will order take-out for dinner. Keegan bought groceries. Therefore, Keegan will not order take-out. Which statement is its conclusion? Keegan will not order take-out If Keegan doesn't buy groceries, he will order take-out. Keegan will order take-out Keegan didn't buy groceries Keegan bought groceries Which statements are its premises? Select all that apply. Keegan bought groceries Keegan will order take-out If Keegan doesn't buy groceries, he will order take-out. Keegan didn't buy groceries Keegan will not order take-out How will we symbolize the premises and conclusion using the simple statements: p - Keegan buys groceries q.- Keegan orders take-out Premise 1: Select an answer Premise Conclusion: square

To analyze the argument, let's break it down:1. **Identify the conclusion**: The conclusion of the argument is the statement that follows logically from the premises. In this case, the conclusion is "Keegan will not order take-out."2. **Identify the premises**: The premises are the statements that provide the basis for the conclusion. In this argument, the premises are: - "If Keegan doesn't buy groceries, he will order take-out for dinner." - "Keegan bought groceries."3. **Symbolize the premises and conclusion using the simple statements**: - Let represent "Keegan buys groceries." - Let represent "Keegan orders take-out." Using these symbols: - Premise 1: "If Keegan doesn't buy groceries, he will order take-out" can be symbolized as . - Premise 2: "Keegan bought groceries" can be symbolized as . Conclusion: "Keegan will not order take-out" can be symbolized as .In summary:- **Conclusion**: Keegan will not order take-out.- **Premises**: - If Keegan doesn't buy groceries, he will order take-out. - Keegan bought groceries.- **Symbolization**: - Premise 1: - Premise 2: - Conclusion: