Soru
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58c18/58c1878a85f4afd9599f185156feb08558ae8c91" alt="In this case, the court held that a valid claim was made by an individual who was denied a two week supply of transitional
medication upon his release from prison, and stated the state must provide an outgoing prisoner who is receiving medication
with a supply sufficient to ensure that he has that medication available during the period of time reasonably necessary to permit
him to consult a doctor and obtain a new supply.
A Durham v. U.S. (1954)
B U.S. v. Hinckley (1981)
C Estellev. Gamble (1976)
D Dusky v. U.S. (1960)
E Wakefield v. Thompson (1999)"
In this case, the court held that a valid claim was made by an individual who was denied a two week supply of transitional medication upon his release from prison, and stated the state must provide an outgoing prisoner who is receiving medication with a supply sufficient to ensure that he has that medication available during the period of time reasonably necessary to permit him to consult a doctor and obtain a new supply. A Durham v. U.S. (1954) B U.S. v. Hinckley (1981) C Estellev. Gamble (1976) D Dusky v. U.S. (1960) E Wakefield v. Thompson (1999)
Çözüm
3.6340 Voting
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e828e/e828e846231df9efd798169f1f4add3bc042202d" alt="avatar"
Alev
Profesyonel · 6 yıl öğretmeniUzman doğrulaması
Cevap
The case you are referring to is E. Wakefield v. Thompson (1999). In this case, the court held that the state must provide an outgoing prisoner who is receiving medication with a supply sufficient to ensure that he has that medication available during the period of time reasonably necessary to permit him to consult a doctor and obtain a new supply.
Derecelendirmek için tıklayın: