the following argument If Abraham doesn't buy groceries , he will order take-out for dinner. Abraham bought groceries. Therefore, Abraham will not order take-out. Which statement is its conclusion? Abraham didn't buy groceries If Abraham doesn't buy groceries, he will order take-out. Abraham bought groceries Abraham will not order take-out Abraham will order take-out Which statements are its premises? Select all that apply. Abraham didn't buy groceries If Abraham doesn't buy groceries, he will order take-out. Abraham bought groceries Abraham will not order take-out Abraham will order take-out How will we symbolize the premises and-conclusion using the simple statements: p - Abraham buys groceries q - Abraham orders take-out Premise 1: Select an answer 0 Premise 2: ? 0 Conclusion: ? B

To analyze the argument, let's break it down:<br /><br />**Conclusion:**<br />The conclusion of the argument is "Abraham will not order take-out."<br /><br />**Premises:**<br />1. "If Abraham doesn't buy groceries, he will order take-out for dinner."<br />2. "Abraham bought groceries."<br /><br />Now, let's symbolize the premises and conclusion using the simple statements:<br />- \( p \): Abraham buys groceries<br />- \( q \): Abraham orders take-out<br /><br />**Symbolization:**<br /><br />- **Premise 1:** "If Abraham doesn't buy groceries, he will order take-out." This can be symbolized as: <br /> \(\neg p \rightarrow q\)<br /><br />- **Premise 2:** "Abraham bought groceries." This can be symbolized as: <br /> \( p \)<br /><br />- **Conclusion:** "Abraham will not order take-out." This can be symbolized as: <br /> \(\neg q\)<br /><br />So, the symbolic representation of the argument is:<br />- Premise 1: \(\neg p \rightarrow q\)<br />- Premise 2: \( p \)<br />- Conclusion: \(\neg q\)